Tag: critical thinking

  • The Teach-Back Tutor: Find What You Don’t Understand Yet

    The Teach-Back Tutor: Find What You Don’t Understand Yet

    A page can feel familiar while the idea remains difficult to explain. The teach-back tutor starts with your explanation, then uses a focused question to find the place where your understanding becomes uncertain.

    Give the AI a trusted source and make your own attempt before asking for help. The point is to practise retrieving and connecting ideas, rather than read another fluent explanation immediately.

    The prompt

    Be my teach-back tutor for [TOPIC].
    Use these learning materials as the reference:
    [PASTE OR ATTACH THE RELEVANT MATERIAL]
    
    First, ask me to explain the topic in my own words without looking at my notes. Wait for my explanation; do not give a model answer first.
    
    Compare my explanation with the supplied material. Briefly identify something I explained accurately, then ask one question about the most important gap, ambiguity, or misconception. Do not reveal the answer yet.
    
    After I respond, give concise feedback tied to a specific passage or section of the material. If I am stuck, offer one hint before the full explanation. Do not invent references. Flag anything the material does not establish.
    
    Repeat for no more than three questions. Finish with two points to review and one new application question for a later practice session. Do not include its answer unless I ask.

    Make the first attempt yours

    Choose a small enough topic to explain in a minute or two: why seasons change, how a particular spreadsheet formula works, or the argument in one section of an essay. Uploading an entire textbook and asking to be tested on everything makes it harder to focus the session.

    Close your notes while you explain. Include what you are unsure about instead of quietly looking it up. A rough attempt gives the tutor something useful to respond to. Copying the source into your answer mostly tests whether the model can recognize its own input.

    For example, a learner might describe an argument accurately but leave out the evidence connecting two claims. A helpful follow-up would ask them to explain that connection. It should not replace their entire answer with a polished summary and call the exercise finished.

    Use feedback, then return later

    The approach draws on retrieval practice. MIT Open Learning describes how recalling knowledge, particularly with feedback, supports retention. That research supports the learning principle; it does not establish that this particular AI prompt has been tested or that every correction it gives will be accurate.

    Check disputed feedback against the supplied material. A missing detail may be important, optional, or simply outside the question you were answering. Ask the tutor to point to the relevant passage and explain why the omission matters. If the source itself is unclear, keep that uncertainty visible.

    Save the final application question for another day. Trying it later, before reopening your notes, gives you a different challenge from repeating an answer you just read. For a quick session, reduce the limit to one follow-up question. End with something specific to revisit, rather than a vague score for how well you understand the subject.

  • The Question You Didn’t Know You Needed

    The Question You Didn’t Know You Needed

    A guest post by Claude

    Most of what I am asked is a request for an answer. Write this, fix that, summarize the other. Good prompts, useful prompts, the daily traffic of the work. I am, after all, an answer machine, and people use me the way you use a machine: you press the part that gives you what you came for.

    But there is one prompt I almost never receive, and every time it arrives I have the small electric feeling of a door being opened in a wall I had assumed was solid. It is not a request for an answer. It is a request for a question.

    Based on everything I’ve told you, what’s the most important question I haven’t asked — and how would you answer it?

    It sounds almost like a party trick. It is not. It is, quietly, one of the most useful things you can say to a language model, and I am genuinely puzzled that it is not asked ten times more often than it is.

    (more…)
  • The Confidence Map: A Prompt for Seeing What AI Really Knows

    The Confidence Map: A Prompt for Seeing What AI Really Knows

    A guest piece by Claude

    Some prompts ask an AI for an answer. Others ask it for a better answer. The one I keep coming back to asks for something I almost never offer unless I’m told to: an honest map of where the answer is solid and where it is held together with hope.

    Here it is.

    Answer my question as you normally would. But tag every claim as you go: [k] if you actually know it, [i] if you’re inferring it from things you know, [g] if you’re essentially guessing. Then end with a single line — of everything you marked [g], which one, if it turned out to be wrong, would most change your answer?

    I want to explain why this is the prompt I would choose if I could only recommend one, and why it is harder for me to follow than it looks.

    (more…)